JHML vs. RFDA
JHML (John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. JHML is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHML returned 14.36%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHML charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.
Performance
JHML vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JHML having a 10.32% return and RFDA slightly higher at 10.33%. Over the past 10 years, JHML has outperformed RFDA with an annualized return of 14.36%, while RFDA has yielded a comparatively lower 13.35% annualized return.
JHML
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 14.36%
RFDA
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 25.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
JHML vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 10.32% | 15.91% | 19.84% | 21.16% | -15.94% | 26.90% | 17.02% | 30.94% | -6.45% | 21.52% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 10.33% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | 19.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and RFDA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between JHML and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHML vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHML
RFDA
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
JHML
RFDA
Financial Services
JHML
RFDA
Industrials
JHML
RFDA
Consumer Cyclical
JHML
RFDA
Healthcare
JHML
RFDA
Communication Services
JHML
RFDA
Consumer Defensive
JHML
RFDA
Energy
JHML
RFDA
Utilities
JHML
RFDA
Basic Materials
JHML
RFDA
Real Estate
JHML
RFDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHML vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank
JHML
RFDA
JHML vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHML | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 4.61 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 16.42 | -3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHML vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and RFDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHML | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -34.60% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -5.45% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.20% | -19.35% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | -19.35% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | -34.60% | -1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -2.06% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -3.73% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.53% | +0.22% |
Volatility
JHML vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 3.21%. This indicates that JHML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHML | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 3.21% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 8.78% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 11.71% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 15.75% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 16.87% | +0.89% |
JHML vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHML vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison
JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than RFDA's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 0.96% | 1.06% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.81% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHML and RFDA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHML has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to RFDA (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs RFDA's -34.60%.
On 10-year performance, JHML leads with 14.36% vs 13.35% for RFDA. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JHML has performed better with a 14.36% return vs 13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.
RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.96% for JHML.
They also come from different issuers: Manulife and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.52% for RFDA.
RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHML and RFDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer