PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHML vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHML vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, JHML has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 14.24%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


JHML

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.79%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.80%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
14.24%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHML vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
11.62%15.91%19.84%21.16%-15.94%26.90%17.02%30.94%-6.45%21.52%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JHML and SPY is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2015

0.97

The correlation between JHML and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHML vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHML
SPY

Technology

27.8%
35.9%

Financial Services

13.8%
11.8%

Industrials

12.2%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.4%

Communication Services

8.4%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.8%

Energy

4.3%
3.6%

Utilities

4.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.9%

Technology

JHML
27.8%
SPY
35.9%

Financial Services

JHML
13.8%
SPY
11.8%

Industrials

JHML
12.2%
SPY
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JHML
10.3%
SPY
10.3%

Healthcare

JHML
9.0%
SPY
8.4%

Communication Services

JHML
8.4%
SPY
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

JHML
5.1%
SPY
4.8%

Energy

JHML
4.3%
SPY
3.6%

Utilities

JHML
4.0%
SPY
2.4%

Basic Materials

JHML
2.8%
SPY
1.8%

Real Estate

JHML
2.4%
SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHML vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHML
JHML Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JHML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHML Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JHML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHML Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHML vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMLSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.38

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.24

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.16

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.61

14.72

+0.89

JHML vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHML Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHML and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMLSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.38

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.82

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.87

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.59

+0.23

Drawdowns

JHML vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMLSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-55.19%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-8.88%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-18.76%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-24.50%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-33.72%

-2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.70%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-9.05%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.91%

-0.20%

Volatility

JHML vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMLSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.84%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

8.90%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

11.83%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.05%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

17.94%

-0.18%

JHML vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHML vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
0.95%1.06%1.16%1.39%1.46%1.08%1.59%1.73%1.57%1.44%1.36%0.38%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JHML and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to JHML (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 14.24% for JHML. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 14.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JHML.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.95% for JHML.

JHML is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. JHML tracks John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHML and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer