JHML vs. SPY
JHML (John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHML is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHML returned 14.24%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JHML charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
JHML vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, JHML has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 14.24%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
JHML
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.24%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
JHML vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 11.62% | 15.91% | 19.84% | 21.16% | -15.94% | 26.90% | 17.02% | 30.94% | -6.45% | 21.52% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and SPY is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2015 | 0.97 |
The correlation between JHML and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHML vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHML
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
JHML
SPY
Financial Services
JHML
SPY
Industrials
JHML
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
JHML
SPY
Healthcare
JHML
SPY
Communication Services
JHML
SPY
Consumer Defensive
JHML
SPY
Energy
JHML
SPY
Utilities
JHML
SPY
Basic Materials
JHML
SPY
Real Estate
JHML
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHML vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
JHML
SPY
JHML vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHML | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.34 | 2.38 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | 3.24 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.16 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 14.72 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHML | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.38 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.82 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.87 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.59 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
JHML vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHML | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -55.19% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -8.88% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.20% | -18.76% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | -24.50% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | -33.72% | -2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.70% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -9.05% | +4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.91% | -0.20% |
Volatility
JHML vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHML | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.84% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 8.90% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 11.83% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 17.05% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 17.94% | -0.18% |
JHML vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHML vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 0.95% | 1.06% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, JHML and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to JHML (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 14.24% for JHML. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 14.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JHML.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.95% for JHML.
JHML is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. JHML tracks John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHML and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer