JHCB vs. UGA
JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCB is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. JHCB is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHCB returned 0.53%/yr vs 22.69%/yr for UGA. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. JHCB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
JHCB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
JHCB
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
JHCB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 0.75% | 8.02% | 2.75% | 8.89% | -15.93% | 3.29% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 28.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCB and UGA is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2021 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JHCB and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.42, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
JHCB
UGA
JHCB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHCB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 3.17 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 9.39 | -4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHCB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -86.59% | +63.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | -18.96% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.54% | -26.68% | +20.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -38.11% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -18.05% | +17.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -36.69% | +28.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 6.43% | -5.45% |
Volatility
JHCB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) is 1.11%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that JHCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 9.24% | -8.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.32% | 30.57% | -27.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 35.22% | -30.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 34.45% | -27.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 37.22% | -30.37% |
JHCB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 4.94% | 4.92% | 5.02% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 2.41% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCB and UGA have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to JHCB (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 0.53% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 0.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHCB and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer