JHCB vs. BSCR
JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. JHCB is actively managed, while BSCR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHCB returned 0.64%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for BSCR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHCB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCR.
Performance
JHCB vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.27% return.
JHCB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
JHCB vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 0.37% | 8.02% | 2.75% | 8.89% | -15.93% | 3.41% |
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% | 5.77% | 4.52% | 6.41% | -9.56% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCB and BSCR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JHCB and BSCR has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCB vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank
JHCB
BSCR
JHCB vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHCB | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 2.14 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 11.08 | -9.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 46.99 | -41.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHCB | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 4.31 | -3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.35 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.59 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
JHCB vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than BSCR's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and BSCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCB | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -17.26% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | -0.42% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.54% | -2.41% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -14.87% | -7.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | 0.00% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -3.35% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.10% | +0.86% |
Volatility
JHCB vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that JHCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCB | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 0.19% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.25% | 0.59% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 1.08% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 4.09% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.88% | 5.35% | +1.53% |
JHCB vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCB vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison
JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than BSCR's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.26% | 4.27% | 3.74% | 2.65% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 3.11% | 3.35% | 0.78% |
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 4.96% | 4.92% | 5.02% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCB and BSCR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHCB has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs BSCR's -17.26%.
On 5-year performance, BSCR leads with 1.41% vs 0.64% for JHCB. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 1.41% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JHCB.
JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.
They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.10% for BSCR.
BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHCB and BSCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer