JHCB vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCB is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. JHCB is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHCB returned 0.64%/yr vs 24.16%/yr for BNO. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. JHCB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

JHCB vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

JHCB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: -0.08%
• 1Y: 5.68%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCB vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF	0.37%	8.02%	2.75%	8.89%	-15.93%	3.41%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-5.44%	9.67%	-3.43%	35.25%	31.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCB and BNO is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	-0.12

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JHCB and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.12 to -0.44, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

JHCB vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCB

JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 37
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 38

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCB vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHCB	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.23	-0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.73	-0.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	5.17	-3.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	9.76	-3.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHCB vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCB and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHCB	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	2.23	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.69	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.14	+0.01

Drawdowns

JHCB vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHCB	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.61%	-87.06%	+64.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.16%	-17.87%	+14.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.54%	-23.75%	+17.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.61%	-33.70%	+11.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-10.29%	+9.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-40.17%	+31.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	9.45%	-8.49%

Volatility

JHCB vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) is 1.42%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that JHCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHCB	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	14.22%	-12.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.25%	36.10%	-32.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.41%	41.46%	-37.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.95%	35.38%	-28.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.88%	36.68%	-29.80%

JHCB vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHCB vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF	4.96%	4.92%	5.02%	4.35%	3.86%	2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHCB and BNO in my portfolio?

JHCB and BNO have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHCB or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to JHCB (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, JHCB or BNO?

On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 24.16% vs 0.64% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHCB or BNO?

Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 24.16% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHCB or BNO?

JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHCB or BNO?

JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between JHCB and BNO?

JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.