JHBIX vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

JHBIX (John Hancock Bond Fund Class I) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - JHBIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. JHBIX is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHBIX returned 2.47%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for SCHG. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. JHBIX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Bond Fund Class I (JHBIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHBIX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, JHBIX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 2.47%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.63% annualized return.

JHBIX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 4.69%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

SCHG

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -4.04%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 22.08%
• 5Y*: 13.26%
• 10Y*: 18.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHBIX John Hancock Bond Fund Class I	0.37%	7.68%	2.28%	6.57%	-14.99%	-0.41%	10.56%	10.48%	-0.86%	5.26%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.23%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JHBIX and SCHG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	-0.01

The correlation between JHBIX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JHBIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHBIX

JHBIX Risk / Return Rank: 26
JHBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
JHBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
JHBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
JHBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
JHBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 27
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund Class I (JHBIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHBIX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.00	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.42	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.18	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	0.98	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	3.19	+1.34

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHBIX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHBIX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHBIX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-34.59%	+14.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.17%	-16.41%	+13.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.62%	-23.39%	+16.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.90%	-34.59%	+14.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.90%	-34.59%	+14.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-6.57%	+5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.73%	-5.20%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	5.03%	-3.93%

Volatility

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Bond Fund Class I (JHBIX) is 1.17%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that JHBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHBIX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.17%	5.90%	-4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.02%	12.46%	-9.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.95%	16.21%	-12.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	22.38%	-16.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	21.58%	-16.62%

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHBIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHBIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

JHBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHBIX John Hancock Bond Fund Class I	4.62%	4.54%	4.45%	4.11%	3.21%	3.57%	5.78%	4.04%	3.81%	3.54%	3.50%	3.81%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHBIX and SCHG in my portfolio?

JHBIX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHBIX or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to JHBIX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHBIX dropped -19.90% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.