JHBIX vs. BIMBX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JHBIX (John Hancock Bond Fund Class I) and BIMBX (BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I) are both mutual funds - JHBIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while BIMBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, JHBIX returned 2.17%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for BIMBX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JHBIX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for BIMBX.

Performance

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Bond Fund Class I (JHBIX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHBIX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than BIMBX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, JHBIX has underperformed BIMBX with an annualized return of 2.17%, while BIMBX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.54% annualized return.

JHBIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.33%
• 6M: -1.03%
• YTD: -0.60%
• 1Y: 2.15%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: -0.33%
• 10Y*: 2.17%
• ALL TIME*: 4.50%

BIMBX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.02%
• 6M: 0.11%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 6.21%
• 5Y*: 3.57%
• 10Y*: 4.54%
• ALL TIME*: 4.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
JHBIX John Hancock Bond Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHBIX John Hancock Bond Fund Class I	-0.60%	7.68%	2.28%	6.57%	-14.99%	-0.41%	10.56%	10.48%	-0.86%	5.26%
BIMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I	1.27%	5.00%	6.83%	6.43%	-2.95%	6.18%	3.57%	8.43%	1.83%	9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between JHBIX and BIMBX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.46

The correlation between JHBIX and BIMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JHBIX vs. BIMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHBIX

JHBIX Risk / Return Rank: 21
JHBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
JHBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
JHBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
JHBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
JHBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

BIMBX

BIMBX Risk / Return Rank: 27
BIMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BIMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BIMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BIMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BIMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund Class I (JHBIX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHBIX	BIMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.04	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	1.59	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.19	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	0.86	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.74	1.91	+0.83

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the BIMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHBIX and BIMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, which is greater than BIMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHBIX and BIMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHBIX	BIMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-8.73%	-11.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.17%	-5.09%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.63%	-5.09%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.90%	-6.50%	-13.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.90%	-8.73%	-11.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-2.85%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-1.22%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	2.30%	-1.07%

Volatility

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Bond Fund Class I (JHBIX) is 1.04%, while BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I (BIMBX) has a volatility of 1.29%. This indicates that JHBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHBIX	BIMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	1.29%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.11%	3.47%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91%	4.23%	-0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	3.68%	+2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	3.60%	+1.36%

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHBIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BIMBX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHBIX vs. BIMBX - Dividend Comparison

JHBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than BIMBX's 3.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Class I	3.53%	2.27%	4.07%	4.48%	4.99%	2.62%	1.31%	3.90%	8.93%	4.08%	5.00%	0.00%
JHBIX John Hancock Bond Fund Class I	4.31%	4.54%	4.45%	4.11%	3.21%	3.57%	5.78%	4.04%	3.81%	3.54%	3.50%	3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHBIX and BIMBX in my portfolio?

JHBIX and BIMBX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHBIX or BIMBX?

BIMBX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to JHBIX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHBIX dropped -19.90% vs BIMBX's -8.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.