JHAC vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JHAC (John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JHAC is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past year, JHAC returned 2.96% vs 29.74% for FTIF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHAC charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

JHAC vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHAC achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 20.97% return.

JHAC

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -3.16%
• YTD: -4.18%
• 6M: -6.35%
• 1Y: 2.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -2.83%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 6M: 19.74%
• 1Y: 29.74%
• 3Y*: 14.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHAC vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	-4.18%	3.33%	23.65%	15.81%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	20.97%	7.79%	0.50%	7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JHAC and FTIF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023	0.63

The correlation between JHAC and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JHAC vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JHAC	FTIF
Technology	27.5%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	23.9%	4.0%
Financial Services	15.9%	-
Communication Services	8.9%	-
Industrials	6.5%	18.0%
Healthcare	6.3%	-
Energy	4.9%	38.0%
Real Estate	3.5%	14.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	22.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JHAC vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHAC

JHAC Risk / Return Rank: 11
JHAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
JHAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
JHAC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
JHAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
JHAC Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 72
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHAC vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHAC	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	1.94	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	2.70	-2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.33	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	5.47	-5.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.59	15.23	-14.64

JHAC vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHAC and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHAC vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHAC drawdown since its inception was -24.43%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHAC and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHAC	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.43%	-27.83%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.24%	-5.46%	-9.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.74%	-4.32%	-3.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-5.95%	+2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	1.96%	+3.07%

Volatility

JHAC vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) is 4.04%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that JHAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHAC	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	4.57%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	10.75%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	15.38%	-1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.41%	18.92%	-1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	18.92%	-1.51%

JHAC vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHAC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHAC vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

JHAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than FTIF's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.15%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	0.60%	0.58%	0.66%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHAC and FTIF in my portfolio?

JHAC and FTIF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHAC or FTIF?

FTIF has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to JHAC (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHAC dropped -24.43% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

Which ETF is better, JHAC or FTIF?

On 1-year performance, FTIF leads with 29.74% vs 2.96% for JHAC. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, JHAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHAC or FTIF?

Over the 1-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 29.74% return vs 2.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHAC or FTIF?

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for JHAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHAC or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.60% for JHAC.

What is the main difference between JHAC and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for JHAC and 0.60% for FTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.