JGLTX vs. HDDVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JGLTX (Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio) and HDDVX (Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D) are both mutual funds - JGLTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Janus Henderson, while HDDVX is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 5 years, JGLTX returned 19.79%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for HDDVX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JGLTX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for HDDVX.

Performance

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGLTX achieves a 35.13% return, which is significantly higher than HDDVX's 15.78% return.

JGLTX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 18.11%
• YTD: 35.13%
• 6M: 35.19%
• 1Y: 60.36%
• 3Y*: 37.03%
• 5Y*: 19.79%
• 10Y*: 24.87%

HDDVX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 7.53%
• YTD: 15.78%
• 6M: 18.69%
• 1Y: 27.75%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio	35.13%	25.19%	32.10%	54.55%	-36.42%	18.28%	50.42%	45.29%	1.17%	15.83%
HDDVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D	15.78%	29.23%	8.73%	17.97%	-8.67%	11.66%	5.15%	18.72%	-9.14%	6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between JGLTX and HDDVX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017	0.67

The correlation between JGLTX and HDDVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JGLTX vs. HDDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGLTX

JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

HDDVX

HDDVX Risk / Return Rank: 44
HDDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
HDDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
HDDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
HDDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HDDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JGLTX	HDDVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	2.04	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.73	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.38	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	2.42	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.43	8.73	+4.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGLTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the HDDVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGLTX and HDDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JGLTX	HDDVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02	2.04	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.91	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.73	-0.37

Drawdowns

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, which is greater than HDDVX's maximum drawdown of -28.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and HDDVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGLTX	HDDVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.78%	-28.60%	-53.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.81%	-11.32%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.72%	-13.01%	-10.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.18%	-22.99%	-22.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.60%	-4.48%	-32.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	3.14%	+1.46%

Volatility

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) at 4.67%. This indicates that JGLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGLTX	HDDVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	4.67%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.85%	10.98%	+5.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.49%	13.43%	+7.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.10%	13.67%	+12.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.49%	13.84%	+10.65%

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than HDDVX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

JGLTX vs. HDDVX - Dividend Comparison

JGLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, which matches HDDVX's 6.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDDVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D	6.62%	7.61%	6.50%	3.08%	4.12%	4.58%	3.22%	3.15%	4.12%	2.32%	0.00%	0.00%
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio	6.64%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	26.96%	14.48%	7.71%	6.81%	4.95%	5.68%	3.71%	16.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JGLTX and HDDVX in my portfolio?

JGLTX and HDDVX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JGLTX or HDDVX?

JGLTX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to HDDVX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGLTX dropped -81.78% vs HDDVX's -28.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JGLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.