HDDVX vs. SRV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HDDVX (Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D) and SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) are both mutual funds - HDDVX is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while SRV is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by NXG. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDDVX returned 12.90%/yr vs 25.87%/yr for SRV. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDDVX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SRV.

Performance

HDDVX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDDVX achieves a 17.10% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 31.90% return.

HDDVX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 17.10%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 29.14%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: —

SRV

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 31.90%
• 6M: 35.27%
• 1Y: 41.53%
• 3Y*: 29.19%
• 5Y*: 25.87%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDDVX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDDVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D	17.10%	29.23%	8.73%	17.97%	-8.67%	11.66%	5.15%	18.72%	-9.14%	6.86%
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund	31.90%	5.05%	50.70%	19.88%	20.11%	50.45%	-41.65%	33.99%	-21.61%	1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HDDVX and SRV is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2017	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between HDDVX and SRV has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HDDVX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDDVX

HDDVX Risk / Return Rank: 56
HDDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
HDDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HDDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
HDDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HDDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

SRV

SRV Risk / Return Rank: 58
SRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SRV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SRV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDDVX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HDDVX	SRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.16	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.76	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	3.18	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	9.03	+0.59

HDDVX vs. SRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDDVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SRV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDDVX and SRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HDDVX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDDVX drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDDVX and SRV.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDDVX	SRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-92.97%	+64.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.32%	-13.13%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.01%	-26.26%	+13.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.99%	-26.26%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.98%	+7.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-48.65%	+44.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	4.61%	-1.47%

Volatility

HDDVX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) is 5.57%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that HDDVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDDVX	SRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	7.42%	-1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	15.76%	-3.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.20%	19.52%	-5.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	26.44%	-12.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	38.30%	-24.39%

HDDVX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDDVX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDDVX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison

HDDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than SRV's 15.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDDVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D	6.54%	7.61%	6.50%	3.08%	4.12%	4.58%	3.22%	3.15%	4.12%	2.32%	0.00%	0.00%
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund	15.66%	19.31%	12.85%	15.56%	8.85%	4.72%	12.05%	10.59%	12.73%	9.07%	7.95%	11.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDDVX and SRV in my portfolio?

HDDVX and SRV have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HDDVX or SRV?

SRV has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to HDDVX (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDDVX dropped -28.60% vs SRV's -92.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.