JGLTX vs. FSELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX).
JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000. FSELX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985.
Performance
JGLTX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JGLTX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -10.57% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 0.00% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 78.49% | -35.27% | 59.16% | 44.33% | 64.50% | -12.01% | 34.51% |
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, JGLTX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 20.23%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 31.42% annualized return.
JGLTX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -10.57%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
FSELX
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 85.27%
- 3Y*
- 43.05%
- 5Y*
- 30.67%
- 10Y*
- 31.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JGLTX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JGLTX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
JGLTX
FSELX
JGLTX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGLTX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 2.07 | -1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 2.72 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 4.58 | -3.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 18.71 | -14.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGLTX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.07 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.80 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.91 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between JGLTX and FSELX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JGLTX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
JGLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%, less than FSELX's 11.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 10.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 11.11% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
Drawdowns
JGLTX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and FSELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGLTX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.78% | -82.54% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -17.23% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.18% | -46.37% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.18% | -46.37% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.81% | -14.38% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -28.82% | -8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 4.21% | +0.37% |
Volatility
JGLTX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) is 6.94%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that JGLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JGLTX | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 10.47% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.62% | 24.91% | -9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.03% | 40.89% | -15.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 38.58% | -12.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 34.71% | -10.43% |