PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDDVX vs. HFQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDDVX achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than HFQTX's 11.64% return.


HDDVX

1D
0.58%
1M
6.11%
YTD
14.90%
6M
18.23%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*

HFQTX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.65%
YTD
11.64%
6M
14.79%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDDVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D
14.90%29.23%8.73%17.97%-8.67%11.66%5.15%18.72%-9.14%6.86%
HFQTX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
11.64%29.80%7.08%10.40%-6.41%12.85%1.59%21.13%-15.74%7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between HDDVX and HFQTX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.93

The correlation between HDDVX and HFQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDDVX vs. HFQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDDVX
HDDVX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HDDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HDDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HFQTX
HFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDDVXHFQTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

2.35

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

3.15

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.66

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.54

9.58

-1.04

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDDVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the HFQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDDVX and HFQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDDVXHFQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.35

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.80

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.55

+0.18

Drawdowns

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDDVX drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum HFQTX drawdown of -34.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDDVX and HFQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDDVXHFQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-34.53%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-10.02%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.01%

-12.18%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

-21.72%

-1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.11%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-5.77%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.79%

+0.35%

Volatility

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) and Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDDVXHFQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.66%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

9.47%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

11.43%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

13.00%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.85%

14.88%

-1.03%

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDDVX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than HFQTX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDDVX vs. HFQTX - Dividend Comparison

HDDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than HFQTX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDDVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D
6.67%7.61%6.50%3.08%4.12%4.58%3.22%3.15%4.12%2.32%
HFQTX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
6.15%6.80%8.18%8.08%8.26%7.10%7.47%6.99%7.85%5.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDDVX and HFQTX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDDVX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to HFQTX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDDVX dropped -28.60% vs HFQTX's -34.53%.

HFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDDVX and HFQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer