PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDDVX vs. ETJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) and Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDDVX achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than ETJ's 0.10% return.


HDDVX

1D
0.58%
1M
6.11%
YTD
14.90%
6M
18.23%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*

ETJ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.51%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDDVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D
14.90%29.23%8.73%17.97%-8.67%11.66%5.15%18.72%-9.14%6.86%
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
0.10%3.49%29.55%14.15%-22.74%11.92%22.31%26.78%-7.03%8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HDDVX and ETJ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.54

The correlation between HDDVX and ETJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDDVX vs. ETJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDDVX
HDDVX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HDDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HDDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ETJ
ETJ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ETJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETJ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETJ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) and Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDDVXETJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

0.45

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

0.73

+1.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.09

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

0.48

+1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.54

1.92

+6.62

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDDVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the ETJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDDVX and ETJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDDVXETJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

0.45

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.22

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.30

+0.43

Drawdowns

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDDVX drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum ETJ drawdown of -32.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDDVX and ETJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDDVXETJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-32.81%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-10.40%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.01%

-15.44%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

-28.55%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.86%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-7.52%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.61%

+0.53%

Volatility

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D (HDDVX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) at 2.91%. This indicates that HDDVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDDVXETJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

2.91%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

8.93%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

11.12%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

15.59%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.85%

17.96%

-4.11%

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDDVX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ETJ's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDDVX vs. ETJ - Dividend Comparison

HDDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, less than ETJ's 9.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
9.19%8.86%8.16%8.86%11.68%8.53%8.79%9.77%11.23%9.82%12.46%10.98%
HDDVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class D
6.67%7.61%6.50%3.08%4.12%4.58%3.22%3.15%4.12%2.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDDVX and ETJ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDDVX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to ETJ (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDDVX dropped -28.60% vs ETJ's -32.81%.

HDDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDDVX and ETJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer