PortfoliosLab logo
JGLTX vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between JGLTX and QQQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

JGLTX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JGLTX:

0.56

QQQ:

0.62

Sortino Ratio

JGLTX:

0.82

QQQ:

0.92

Omega Ratio

JGLTX:

1.11

QQQ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

JGLTX:

0.53

QQQ:

0.60

Martin Ratio

JGLTX:

1.70

QQQ:

1.94

Ulcer Index

JGLTX:

7.37%

QQQ:

7.02%

Daily Std Dev

JGLTX:

27.89%

QQQ:

25.59%

Max Drawdown

JGLTX:

-79.71%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

JGLTX:

-1.08%

QQQ:

-3.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGLTX achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 1.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JGLTX having a 17.97% annualized return and QQQ not far behind at 17.69%.


JGLTX

YTD

4.12%

1M

9.46%

6M

2.76%

1Y

15.75%

3Y*

24.17%

5Y*

14.91%

10Y*

17.97%

QQQ

YTD

1.69%

1M

7.77%

6M

2.15%

1Y

15.88%

3Y*

19.78%

5Y*

18.08%

10Y*

17.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco QQQ

JGLTX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JGLTX vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGLTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JGLTX is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JGLTX is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JGLTX is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JGLTX is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JGLTX is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JGLTX is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JGLTX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JGLTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGLTX and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

JGLTX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

JGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.70%17.04%6.31%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.58%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

JGLTX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -79.71%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and QQQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

JGLTX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ) have volatilities of 5.90% and 5.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...