PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFRDX vs. JFNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D (JFRDX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFRDX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than JFNAX's 9.41% return.


JFRDX

1D
3.28%
1M
-2.85%
6M
2.86%
YTD
0.04%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.45%

JFNAX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.72%
6M
8.57%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
11.10%
ALL TIME*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFRDX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D
0.04%18.31%28.26%40.01%-33.58%22.73%39.22%36.75%1.49%16.74%
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
9.41%24.61%3.41%7.35%-2.86%6.59%25.42%28.98%4.00%17.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JFRDX and JFNAX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between JFRDX and JFNAX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFRDX vs. JFNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JFRDX
JFRDX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
JFRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
JFRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

JFNAX
JFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D (JFRDX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JFRDXJFNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.43

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

4.06

-3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

12.66

-11.98

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFRDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the JFNAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFRDX and JFNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFRDX drawdown since its inception was -40.91%, which is greater than JFNAX's maximum drawdown of -31.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFRDX and JFNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFRDXJFNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.91%

-31.07%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.05%

-9.71%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-21.28%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.91%

-22.29%

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-2.52%

-5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-6.25%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.28%

3.11%

+3.17%

Volatility

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D (JFRDX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) at 5.23%. This indicates that JFRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFRDXJFNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

5.23%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

12.28%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

15.75%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

16.11%

+6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

17.37%

+4.73%

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFRDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than JFNAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFRDX vs. JFNAX - Dividend Comparison

JFRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, more than JFNAX's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
4.16%4.56%5.74%4.28%0.08%9.90%7.82%6.18%13.55%1.03%0.97%8.93%
JFRDX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D
13.10%13.10%11.27%9.12%0.06%10.12%8.26%7.21%8.88%9.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFRDX and JFNAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFRDX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to JFNAX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFRDX dropped -40.91% vs JFNAX's -31.07%.

JFNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFRDX and JFNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer