JFNAX vs. IBB
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB).
JFNAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998. IBB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2001.
Performance
JFNAX vs. IBB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JFNAX vs. IBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFNAX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A | -3.77% | 24.61% | 3.41% | 7.35% | -2.86% | 6.59% | 25.42% | 28.98% | 4.00% | 22.35% |
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.88% | 27.98% | -2.41% | 3.76% | -13.69% | 0.95% | 26.01% | 25.42% | -9.53% | 21.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly lower than IBB's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, JFNAX has outperformed IBB with an annualized return of 10.96%, while IBB has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
JFNAX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -3.77%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
IBB
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 37.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JFNAX vs. IBB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IBB's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JFNAX vs. IBB — Risk / Return Rank
JFNAX
IBB
JFNAX vs. IBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JFNAX | IBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.56 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 2.16 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.86 | -1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 10.20 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JFNAX | IBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.56 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.12 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.30 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.26 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between JFNAX and IBB is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JFNAX vs. IBB - Dividend Comparison
JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than IBB's 0.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFNAX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A | 4.73% | 4.56% | 5.74% | 4.28% | 0.08% | 9.90% | 7.82% | 6.18% | 13.55% | 1.03% | 0.97% | 8.93% |
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.33% | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.19% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
JFNAX vs. IBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum IBB drawdown of -62.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and IBB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JFNAX | IBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -62.85% | +31.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -11.65% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -39.82% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.39% | -39.82% | +12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -4.16% | -2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -21.30% | +14.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.27% | +0.36% |
Volatility
JFNAX vs. IBB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) is 6.00%, while iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that JFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JFNAX | IBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 8.38% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 14.50% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 24.01% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 21.87% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 23.37% | -5.96% |