PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFNAX vs. PHSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly higher than PHSTX's -4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, JFNAX has outperformed PHSTX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while PHSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.58% annualized return.


JFNAX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
10.23%

PHSTX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
-4.12%
6M
-4.03%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
-3.68%24.61%3.41%7.35%-2.86%6.59%25.42%28.98%4.00%22.35%
PHSTX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
-4.12%15.20%1.35%9.11%-4.88%19.60%15.94%30.26%-0.76%15.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JFNAX and PHSTX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009

0.92

The correlation between JFNAX and PHSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFNAX vs. PHSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFNAX
JFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PHSTX
PHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JFNAXPHSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.37

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

3.44

+4.88

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the PHSTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFNAX and PHSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JFNAXPHSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.94

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.55

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.61

+0.22

Drawdowns

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum PHSTX drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and PHSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFNAXPHSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-45.51%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-9.71%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.28%

-20.71%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-20.71%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.39%

-25.51%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

-8.08%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-9.92%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.86%

-0.82%

Volatility

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) at 4.04%. This indicates that JFNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFNAXPHSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

4.04%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

10.14%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

14.14%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

14.41%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

15.78%

+1.60%

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than PHSTX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Dividend Comparison

JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than PHSTX's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
4.73%4.56%5.74%4.28%0.08%9.90%7.82%6.18%13.55%1.03%0.97%8.93%
PHSTX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
1.86%1.79%4.92%5.62%7.82%11.98%9.58%5.72%6.82%17.31%10.65%13.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JFNAX and PHSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JFNAX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to PHSTX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFNAX dropped -31.07% vs PHSTX's -45.51%.

JFNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFNAX and PHSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer