PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFNAX vs. PHSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly higher than PHSTX's 4.28% return. Over the past 10 years, JFNAX has outperformed PHSTX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while PHSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.06% annualized return.


JFNAX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.72%
6M
8.57%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
11.10%
ALL TIME*
15.14%

PHSTX

1D
-1.29%
1M
-2.86%
6M
3.48%
YTD
4.28%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
9.06%
ALL TIME*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
9.41%24.61%3.41%7.35%-2.86%6.59%25.42%28.98%4.00%22.35%
PHSTX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
4.28%15.20%1.35%9.11%-4.88%19.60%15.94%30.26%-0.76%15.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JFNAX and PHSTX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2009

0.92

The correlation between JFNAX and PHSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFNAX vs. PHSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JFNAX
JFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PHSTX
PHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JFNAXPHSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.27

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

2.43

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

5.91

+6.75

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the PHSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFNAX and PHSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum PHSTX drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and PHSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFNAXPHSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-45.51%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-9.71%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.28%

-20.71%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-20.71%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.39%

-25.51%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-3.05%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-9.90%

+3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.98%

-0.87%

Volatility

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) is 5.23%, while Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that JFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFNAXPHSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

5.60%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

11.63%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

15.20%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

14.74%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

15.81%

+1.56%

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than PHSTX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFNAX vs. PHSTX - Dividend Comparison

JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than PHSTX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
4.16%4.56%5.74%4.28%0.08%9.90%7.82%6.18%13.55%1.03%0.97%8.93%
PHSTX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
1.71%1.79%4.92%5.62%7.82%11.98%9.58%5.72%6.82%17.31%10.65%13.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JFNAX and PHSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PHSTX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to JFNAX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFNAX dropped -31.07% vs PHSTX's -45.51%.

JFNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFNAX and PHSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer