PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFNAX vs. JACNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFNAX achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than JACNX's 22.37% return. Over the past 10 years, JFNAX has underperformed JACNX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while JACNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.21% annualized return.


JFNAX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
10.23%

JACNX

1D
2.08%
1M
9.51%
YTD
22.37%
6M
20.32%
1Y
35.36%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
14.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
-3.68%24.61%3.41%7.35%-2.86%6.59%25.42%28.98%4.00%22.35%
JACNX
Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund
22.37%7.34%18.44%21.58%-21.54%20.79%27.88%43.19%-4.08%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between JFNAX and JACNX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between JFNAX and JACNX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFNAX vs. JACNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFNAX
JFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JACNX
JACNX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JACNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JACNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JACNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JACNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JACNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) and Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JFNAXJACNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.87

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.53

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.61

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.33

8.20

+0.13

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the JACNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFNAX and JACNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JFNAXJACNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.87

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.38

+0.45

Drawdowns

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFNAX drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum JACNX drawdown of -66.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFNAX and JACNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFNAXJACNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-66.81%

+35.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-14.27%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.28%

-23.92%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-30.32%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.39%

-40.25%

+12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

0.00%

-6.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-14.67%

+8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

4.53%

-1.49%

Volatility

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) is 4.70%, while Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that JFNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JACNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFNAXJACNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

6.15%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

15.75%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

19.90%

-5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

22.05%

-6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

21.79%

-4.41%

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFNAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than JACNX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFNAX vs. JACNX - Dividend Comparison

JFNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than JACNX's 9.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JACNX
Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund
9.07%11.10%11.53%7.13%0.53%9.63%1.69%11.74%8.86%7.77%3.52%2.71%
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
4.73%4.56%5.74%4.28%0.08%9.90%7.82%6.18%13.55%1.03%0.97%8.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFNAX and JACNX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JACNX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to JFNAX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFNAX dropped -31.07% vs JACNX's -66.81%.

JACNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFNAX and JACNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer