JACNX vs. JNGTX

In the year-to-date period, JACNX achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than JNGTX's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, JACNX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 2.76%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.94% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

JACNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current JACNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the JNGTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JACNX and JNGTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

JACNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, more than JNGTX's 11.16% yield.

The maximum JACNX drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -46.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACNX and JNGTX.

Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) at 5.45%. This indicates that JACNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.