JACNX vs. JNGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX).
JACNX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Feb 29, 2000. JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
JACNX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JACNX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACNX Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund | -4.88% | 7.34% | 18.44% | 21.58% | -21.54% | 20.79% | 27.88% | 43.19% | -4.08% | 5.00% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -7.02% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | 0.92% | 44.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JACNX achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly higher than JNGTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JACNX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.41% annualized return.
JACNX
- 1D
- 4.46%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
JNGTX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 20.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JACNX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JACNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JACNX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank
JACNX
JNGTX
JACNX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JACNX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 1.16 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.73 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.80 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 6.10 | -4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JACNX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.16 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.41 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.84 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.44 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between JACNX and JNGTX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JACNX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison
JACNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, less than JNGTX's 14.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACNX Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund | 11.67% | 11.10% | 11.53% | 7.13% | 0.53% | 9.63% | 1.69% | 11.74% | 8.86% | 7.77% | 3.52% | 2.71% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 14.43% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
Drawdowns
JACNX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JACNX drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACNX and JNGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JACNX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.81% | -84.79% | +17.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.27% | -15.93% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -46.46% | +16.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.25% | -46.46% | +6.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -12.54% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -40.47% | +25.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 4.69% | +0.23% |
Volatility
JACNX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Contrarian Fund (JACNX) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) at 8.32%. This indicates that JACNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JACNX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 8.32% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 16.27% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 25.51% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 26.29% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 24.40% | -2.71% |