PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JETS vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JETS vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed USL with an annualized return of 2.63%, while USL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.


JETS

1D
-2.35%
1M
9.48%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
3.46%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.63%

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETS vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
-0.86%11.64%33.21%11.42%-19.01%-5.13%-28.93%14.38%-14.30%18.66%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between JETS and USL is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015

0.09

The correlation between JETS and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JETS vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JETS
USL

Industrials

88.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%

-

Technology

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

JETS
88.8%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

JETS
8.6%
USL

-

Technology

JETS
2.6%
USL

-

Basic Materials

JETS

-

USL

-

Communication Services

JETS

-

USL

-

Consumer Defensive

JETS

-

USL

-

Energy

JETS

-

USL

-

Financial Services

JETS

-

USL
4.5%

Healthcare

JETS

-

USL

-

Real Estate

JETS

-

USL

-

Utilities

JETS

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JETS vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETS
JETS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETS vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JETSUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.34

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.47

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

7.02

-4.58

JETS vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETS and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JETSUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.04

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.58

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.34

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.01

+0.04

Drawdowns

JETS vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JETSUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-89.06%

+24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.13%

-16.76%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-23.33%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.36%

-33.82%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

-66.02%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.40%

-38.16%

+20.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.19%

-61.46%

+36.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.40%

8.27%

+1.13%

Volatility

JETS vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) at 10.53%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JETSUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

10.53%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

23.33%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.61%

28.54%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

30.08%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.18%

32.35%

+1.83%

JETS vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

JETS vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
0.84%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%0.04%1.24%0.09%1.57%0.58%0.17%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JETS and USL have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JETS has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to USL (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, USL leads with 10.91% vs 2.63% for JETS. On fees, JETS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, USL has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USL has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JETS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

JETS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: US Global and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JETS and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer