JETS vs. KARS
JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) and KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - JETS tracks the U.S. Global Jets Index while KARS tracks the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JETS returned 8.32%/yr vs -7.87%/yr for KARS. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JETS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KARS.
Performance
JETS vs. KARS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a 16.39% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's -3.05% return.
JETS
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- YTD
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 42.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.06%
KARS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- 6M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -3.05%
- 1Y
- 25.62%
- 3Y*
- -2.83%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $91.26M | $93.79M | $96.86M | |
| $362.38K | $469.91K | $1.03M |
JETS vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 16.39% | 11.64% | 33.21% | 11.42% | -19.01% | -5.13% | -28.93% | 14.38% | -18.36% |
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | -3.05% | 46.04% | -17.88% | -7.85% | -39.20% | 24.11% | 71.17% | 34.66% | -28.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETS and KARS is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between JETS and KARS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETS vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank
JETS
KARS
JETS vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETS | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.17 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.03 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 3.12 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETS vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, roughly equal to the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and KARS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETS | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -64.85% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.13% | -24.94% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -45.42% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.38% | -64.85% | +24.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | -40.90% | +37.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -28.49% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.52% | 8.23% | +1.29% |
Volatility
JETS vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) at 8.34%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETS | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 8.34% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.90% | 22.03% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.05% | 28.26% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 30.00% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.23% | 29.39% | +4.84% |
JETS vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETS vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison
JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than KARS's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.71% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JETS and KARS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JETS has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to KARS (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs KARS's -64.85%.
On 5-year performance, JETS leads with 8.32% vs -7.87% for KARS. On fees, JETS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KARS has been the lower-risk option at 8.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JETS has performed better with a 8.32% return vs -7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JETS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.
JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.19% for KARS.
JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.72% for KARS.
JETS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETS and KARS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer