PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JETS vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JETS vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than KARS's 16.24% return.


JETS

1D
-2.35%
1M
9.48%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
3.46%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.63%

KARS

1D
-3.32%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
16.24%
6M
17.45%
1Y
69.84%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETS vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
-0.86%11.64%33.21%11.42%-19.01%-5.13%-28.93%14.38%-18.36%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
16.24%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%34.66%-28.33%

Correlation

The correlation between JETS and KARS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2018

0.51

The correlation between JETS and KARS shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JETS vs. KARS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JETS
KARS

Industrials

88.8%
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
34.3%

Technology

2.6%
17.2%

Basic Materials

-

26.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

JETS
88.8%
KARS
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JETS
8.6%
KARS
34.3%

Technology

JETS
2.6%
KARS
17.2%

Basic Materials

JETS

-

KARS
26.6%

Communication Services

JETS

-

KARS

-

Consumer Defensive

JETS

-

KARS

-

Energy

JETS

-

KARS

-

Financial Services

JETS

-

KARS

-

Healthcare

JETS

-

KARS

-

Real Estate

JETS

-

KARS

-

Utilities

JETS

-

KARS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JETS vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETS
JETS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETS vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JETSKARSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

2.71

-2.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

3.33

-2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

6.97

-6.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.44

19.68

-17.25

JETS vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETS and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JETSKARSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.71

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

-0.08

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.20

-0.15

Drawdowns

JETS vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, roughly equal to the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JETSKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-64.85%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.13%

-10.08%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-47.79%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.36%

-64.85%

+20.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.40%

-29.15%

+11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.19%

-28.32%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.40%

3.56%

+5.84%

Volatility

JETS vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) at 9.00%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JETSKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

9.00%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

18.66%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.61%

25.97%

+6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

29.78%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.18%

29.29%

+4.89%

JETS vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

JETS vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than KARS's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JETS
U.S. Global Jets ETF
0.84%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%0.04%1.24%0.09%1.57%0.58%0.17%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.16%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JETS and KARS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JETS has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to KARS (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 5-year performance, JETS leads with 1.37% vs -2.35% for KARS. On fees, JETS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KARS has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JETS has performed better with a 1.37% return vs -2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JETS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.16% for KARS.

JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.72% for KARS.

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JETS and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer