JETS vs. IYT
JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) and IYT (iShares Transportation Average ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JETS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Jets Index, while IYT is a Transportation Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JETS returned 2.63%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for IYT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JETS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYT.
Performance
JETS vs. IYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than IYT's 12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed IYT with an annualized return of 2.63%, while IYT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.
JETS
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 9.48%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.63%
IYT
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 29.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
JETS vs. IYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | -0.86% | 11.64% | 33.21% | 11.42% | -19.01% | -5.13% | -28.93% | 14.38% | -14.30% | 18.66% |
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 12.55% | 11.48% | 4.10% | 24.62% | -21.74% | 26.41% | 14.20% | 20.11% | -12.87% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETS and IYT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between JETS and IYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
JETS vs. IYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JETS
IYT
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
JETS
IYT
Consumer Cyclical
JETS
IYT
-
Technology
JETS
IYT
Basic Materials
JETS
-
IYT
-
Communication Services
JETS
-
IYT
-
Consumer Defensive
JETS
-
IYT
-
Energy
JETS
-
IYT
-
Financial Services
JETS
-
IYT
-
Healthcare
JETS
-
IYT
-
Real Estate
JETS
-
IYT
-
Utilities
JETS
-
IYT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETS vs. IYT — Risk / Return Rank
JETS
IYT
JETS vs. IYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JETS | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 1.45 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.08 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.42 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 7.80 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JETS | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.45 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.25 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.45 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.42 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
JETS vs. IYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than IYT's maximum drawdown of -60.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and IYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETS | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -60.39% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.13% | -12.09% | -12.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -26.35% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.36% | -29.15% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | -41.28% | -23.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.40% | -1.50% | -15.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.19% | -9.32% | -15.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.40% | 3.74% | +5.66% |
Volatility
JETS vs. IYT - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) at 5.92%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETS | IYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 5.92% | +5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 15.44% | +8.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.61% | 20.17% | +12.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.27% | 22.29% | +9.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.18% | 23.14% | +11.04% |
JETS vs. IYT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IYT's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETS vs. IYT - Dividend Comparison
JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than IYT's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYT iShares Transportation Average ETF | 0.96% | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 0.92% | 0.96% | 1.28% |
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.84% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JETS and IYT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JETS has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to IYT (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs IYT's -60.39%.
On 10-year performance, IYT leads with 10.45% vs 2.63% for JETS. On fees, IYT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYT has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JETS.
IYT has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.84% for JETS.
JETS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IYT is Transportation Equities. JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.42% for IYT.
IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETS and IYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer