JEPI vs. GCOW
JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. JEPI is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JEPI returned 7.26%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for GCOW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JEPI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
JEPI vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPI achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return.
JEPI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
JEPI vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.15% | 8.09% | 12.57% | 9.83% | -3.49% | 21.52% | 18.61% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.18% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | 22.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPI and GCOW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between JEPI and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
JEPI vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JEPI
GCOW
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
JEPI
GCOW
Healthcare
JEPI
GCOW
Industrials
JEPI
GCOW
Consumer Cyclical
JEPI
GCOW
Financial Services
JEPI
GCOW
-
Consumer Defensive
JEPI
GCOW
Communication Services
JEPI
GCOW
Utilities
JEPI
GCOW
Real Estate
JEPI
GCOW
-
Energy
JEPI
GCOW
Basic Materials
JEPI
GCOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPI vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
JEPI
GCOW
JEPI vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEPI | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 5.71 | -4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 15.05 | -11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEPI | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.52 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.92 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.59 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
JEPI vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPI drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPI and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPI | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.71% | -37.64% | +23.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -4.77% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | -12.35% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.71% | -21.48% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -2.73% | -2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -5.84% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.81% | +0.26% |
Volatility
JEPI vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) is 1.35%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that JEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPI | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 2.85% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.07% | 7.99% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.85% | 10.81% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 13.49% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.80% | 16.20% | -5.40% |
JEPI vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEPI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEPI vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
JEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than GCOW's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.43% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.27% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 8.40% | 11.68% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPI and GCOW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCOW has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to JEPI (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPI dropped -13.71% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.34% vs 7.26% for JEPI. On fees, JEPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 4.43% for GCOW.
JEPI is categorized as Dividend, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPI and 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPI and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer