JELMX vs. PALDX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio (JELMX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).
JELMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 6, 1997. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
JELMX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JELMX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JELMX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio | -2.66% | 9.26% | 8.15% | 10.70% | -14.86% | 7.89% | 3.27% | 16.71% | -3.99% | 0.57% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -3.62% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JELMX achieves a -2.66% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's -3.62% return.
JELMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -2.66%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- 5.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JELMX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JELMX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JELMX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
JELMX
PALDX
JELMX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio (JELMX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JELMX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 1.12 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.65 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 1.42 | -0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 6.83 | -4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JELMX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.12 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.67 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.71 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between JELMX and PALDX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JELMX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
JELMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than PALDX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JELMX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio | 5.44% | 5.30% | 2.83% | 9.63% | 6.29% | 2.77% | 7.50% | 5.78% | 9.60% | 0.00% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.62% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
JELMX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JELMX drawdown since its inception was -44.89%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELMX and PALDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JELMX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.89% | -26.16% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -8.20% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | -20.47% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -5.96% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -4.16% | -7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.70% | +0.59% |
Volatility
JELMX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Managed Volatility Moderate Portfolio (JELMX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 3.05% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JELMX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 3.05% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.00% | 5.86% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 11.52% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 12.08% | -4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.35% | 12.75% | -5.40% |