JDST vs. TMF
JDST (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X) are both exchange-traded funds - JDST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JDST returned -64.82%/yr vs -16.47%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. JDST charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for TMF.
Performance
JDST vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDST achieves a -35.89% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JDST has underperformed TMF with an annualized return of -64.82%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively higher -16.47% annualized return.
JDST
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -35.89%
- 6M
- -46.82%
- 1Y
- -81.68%
- 3Y*
- -69.10%
- 5Y*
- -52.94%
- 10Y*
- -64.82%
TMF
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- -20.47%
- 5Y*
- -29.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.47%
JDST vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | -35.89% | -91.10% | -40.98% | -28.29% | -26.25% | 10.97% | -95.97% | -80.30% | -1.60% | -63.44% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | -5.05% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDST and TMF is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDST vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
JDST
TMF
JDST vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JDST | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | 0.06 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | 0.29 | -2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.04 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -0.08 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDST | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | 0.06 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | -0.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.62 | -0.38 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.13 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
JDST vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDST and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDST | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -92.89% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.98% | -26.51% | -62.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.58% | -56.31% | -42.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.28% | -88.81% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -92.89% | -7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -92.14% | -7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.32% | -43.62% | -51.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.20% | 11.42% | +53.78% |
Volatility
JDST vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) has a higher volatility of 32.18% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) at 8.30%. This indicates that JDST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDST | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.18% | 8.30% | +23.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.24% | 19.33% | +59.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.90% | 28.86% | +70.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.87% | 46.75% | +34.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.74% | 43.92% | +60.82% |
JDST vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDST has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDST vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
JDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than TMF's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | 12.55% | 15.08% | 6.50% | 4.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 3.16% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDST and TMF have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JDST has higher volatility (32.18%) compared to TMF (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDST dropped -100.00% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -16.47% vs -64.82% for JDST. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -16.47% return vs -64.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for JDST.
JDST has the higher dividend yield at 12.55%, compared with 4.11% for TMF.
JDST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. JDST tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%), while TMF tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.10% for JDST and 1.09% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JDST and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer