PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDST vs. GC=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JDST vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) and Gold Futures (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDST achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's -5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, JDST has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of -59.50%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.


JDST

1D
7.27%
1M
10.46%
6M
5.97%
YTD
-18.61%
1Y
-79.18%
3Y*
-66.93%
5Y*
-52.90%
10Y*
-59.50%
ALL TIME*
-68.78%

GC=F

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.34%
6M
-13.05%
YTD
-5.25%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
28.30%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
11.63%
ALL TIME*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$116.79M$56.64M$28.60M
$11.95M$13.83M$18.78M

JDST vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JDST
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares
-18.61%-91.10%-40.98%-28.29%-26.25%10.97%-95.97%-80.30%-1.60%-63.44%
GC=F
Gold Futures
-5.25%64.52%27.48%13.34%-0.43%-3.47%24.59%18.87%-2.14%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between JDST and GC=F is -0.73, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013

-0.64

The correlation between JDST and GC=F has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDST vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JDST
JDST Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
JDST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDST Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDST Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
JDST Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDST Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JDST vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JDSTGC=FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.18

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

0.98

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

2.17

-3.27

JDST vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDST Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDST and GC=F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JDST vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDST and GC=F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDSTGC=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-44.36%

-55.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-88.72%

-25.06%

-63.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.58%

-25.06%

-73.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.28%

-25.06%

-74.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

-25.06%

-74.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-22.94%

-77.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.35%

-13.58%

-81.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.79%

11.31%

+61.48%

Volatility

JDST vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) has a higher volatility of 30.04% compared to Gold Futures (GC=F) at 6.13%. This indicates that JDST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDSTGC=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.04%

6.13%

+23.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

86.12%

23.41%

+62.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.73%

28.14%

+78.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.80%

18.65%

+64.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.95%

16.66%

+87.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDST and GC=F have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JDST has higher volatility (30.04%) compared to GC=F (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDST dropped -100.00% vs GC=F's -44.36%.

GC=F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDST and GC=F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer