JCHI vs. XPP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - JCHI is a China Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while XPP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). JCHI is actively managed, while XPP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JCHI returned 7.47%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for XPP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for XPP.

Performance

JCHI vs. XPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -34.24% return.

JCHI

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: -5.00%
• 6M: -5.85%
• 1Y: 7.72%
• 3Y*: 7.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XPP

• 1D: -4.68%
• 1M: -21.13%
• YTD: -34.24%
• 6M: -35.23%
• 1Y: -31.54%
• 3Y*: 0.47%
• 5Y*: -23.89%
• 10Y*: -6.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	-5.00%	27.66%	13.77%	-17.31%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-34.24%	45.84%	38.18%	-27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and XPP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2023	0.93

The correlation between JCHI and XPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JCHI vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 15
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 15
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 15

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 3
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 3
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JCHI	XPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	-0.80	+1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	-1.05	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.88	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	-0.71	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.21	-1.73	+2.94

JCHI vs. XPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the XPP Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and XPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and XPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCHI	XPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-89.90%	+60.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	-44.65%	+30.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	-52.95%	+25.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-85.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.47%	-82.59%	+70.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-47.92%	+34.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.41%	18.20%	-11.79%

Volatility

JCHI vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) is 6.09%, while ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that JCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCHI	XPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	13.07%	-6.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	29.87%	-16.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	39.37%	-21.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.79%	62.86%	-38.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.79%	54.80%	-30.01%

JCHI vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than XPP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCHI vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than XPP's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.91%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	3.18%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCHI and XPP in my portfolio?

JCHI and XPP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JCHI or XPP?

XPP has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to JCHI (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCHI dropped -29.57% vs XPP's -89.90%.

Which ETF is better, JCHI or XPP?

On 3-year performance, JCHI leads with 7.47% vs 0.47% for XPP. On fees, JCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, JCHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JCHI or XPP?

Over the 3-year period, JCHI has performed better with a 7.47% return vs 0.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCHI or XPP?

JCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCHI or XPP?

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 1.91% for JCHI.

What is the main difference between JCHI and XPP?

JCHI is categorized as China Equities, while XPP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.95% for XPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.