JAKVX vs. PDT
JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) and PDT (John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund) are both mutual funds - JAKVX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by John Hancock, while PDT is a Dividend fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past year, JAKVX returned 19.27% vs 4.71% for PDT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAKVX charges 1.54%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for PDT.
Performance
JAKVX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAKVX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than PDT's 4.10% return.
JAKVX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
JAKVX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 9.20% | 17.29% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 4.10% | 5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAKVX and PDT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAKVX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank
JAKVX
PDT
JAKVX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAKVX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.10 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 0.88 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 1.90 | +10.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAKVX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAKVX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKVX and PDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAKVX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -62.39% | +57.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -5.38% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -3.87% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -10.01% | +9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 2.48% | -0.91% |
Volatility
JAKVX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAKVX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 2.82% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.36% | 7.09% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 8.98% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 17.00% | -9.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 25.16% | -17.59% |
JAKVX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAKVX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAKVX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison
JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, which matches PDT's 7.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.76% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.78% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAKVX and PDT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDT has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to JAKVX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKVX dropped -5.16% vs PDT's -62.39%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAKVX and PDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer