PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAKVX vs. PDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAKVX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAKVX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than PDT's 4.10% return.


JAKVX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
9.20%
6M
9.20%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PDT

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
4.10%
6M
3.86%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAKVX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAKVX and PDT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAKVX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAKVX
JAKVX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JAKVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PDT
PDT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAKVX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAKVXPDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.10

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

0.88

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

1.90

+10.58

JAKVX vs. PDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAKVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the PDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAKVX and PDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAKVX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAKVX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKVX and PDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAKVXPDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-62.39%

+57.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-5.38%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-3.87%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-10.01%

+9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

2.48%

-0.91%

Volatility

JAKVX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAKVXPDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.82%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

7.09%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

8.98%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

17.00%

-9.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.57%

25.16%

-17.59%

JAKVX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAKVX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAKVX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison

JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, which matches PDT's 7.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAKVX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6
7.76%8.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
7.78%7.80%7.77%10.14%9.04%6.42%8.43%6.70%8.69%9.94%9.15%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAKVX and PDT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDT has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to JAKVX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKVX dropped -5.16% vs PDT's -62.39%.

JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAKVX and PDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer