PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAKVX vs. QLEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAKVX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than QLEIX's 0.43% return.


JAKVX

1D
0.89%
1M
1.74%
6M
6.96%
YTD
12.74%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.96%

QLEIX

1D
2.11%
1M
4.63%
6M
1.63%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
22.95%
10Y*
11.74%
ALL TIME*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAKVX and QLEIX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAKVX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAKVX
JAKVX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JAKVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QLEIX
QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAKVXQLEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

2.65

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

7.54

+5.31

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAKVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the QLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAKVX and QLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAKVX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKVX and QLEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAKVXQLEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-38.11%

+32.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-6.01%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.19%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-7.66%

+6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.10%

-0.39%

Volatility

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) is 1.85%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that JAKVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAKVXQLEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

3.44%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

6.70%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

8.12%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

10.03%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.48%

10.60%

-3.12%

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAKVX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAKVX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison

JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, more than QLEIX's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAKVX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6
7.52%8.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLEIX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund
1.74%1.75%7.12%20.88%14.15%0.00%1.57%0.00%6.03%9.11%3.01%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAKVX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLEIX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to JAKVX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAKVX dropped -5.16% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.

JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAKVX and QLEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer