PDT vs. UTG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PDT (John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund) is Dividend fund managed by John Hancock, while UTG (Reaves Utility Income Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PDT returned 5.94%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for UTG. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PDT vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDT achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than UTG's 19.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PDT has underperformed UTG with an annualized return of 5.94%, while UTG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.

PDT

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 6M: 3.61%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: 2.27%
• 10Y*: 5.94%

UTG

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 19.18%
• 6M: 21.56%
• 1Y: 30.08%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 10.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDT vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	3.12%	7.64%	29.92%	-9.55%	-16.30%	25.98%	-14.20%	39.29%	-12.49%	21.22%
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust	19.18%	23.24%	28.10%	2.84%	-13.38%	14.26%	-5.25%	33.65%	1.84%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PDT and UTG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2004	0.38

Return for Risk

PDT vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDT

PDT Risk / Return Rank: 7
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

UTG

UTG Risk / Return Rank: 81
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDT vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDT	UTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	1.75	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	2.26	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.30	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	2.61	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.94	5.66	-3.71

PDT vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDT and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDT vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDT drawdown since its inception was -62.39%, smaller than the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDT and UTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDT	UTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.39%	-67.77%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-11.59%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.06%	-15.03%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.44%	-26.54%	-13.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.39%	-47.91%	-14.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.78%	-1.59%	-3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.01%	-8.73%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	5.33%	-2.87%

Volatility

PDT vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) is 2.72%, while Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that PDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDT	UTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	6.10%	-3.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.14%	13.30%	-6.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.98%	17.32%	-8.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	16.95%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.16%	21.64%	+3.52%

Dividends

PDT vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

PDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than UTG's 5.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	7.85%	7.80%	7.77%	10.14%	9.04%	6.42%	8.43%	6.70%	8.69%	9.94%	9.15%	7.88%
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust	5.64%	6.42%	7.19%	8.53%	8.07%	6.35%	6.59%	5.69%	6.86%	6.21%	9.02%	6.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDT and UTG in my portfolio?

PDT and UTG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDT or UTG?

UTG has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to PDT (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDT dropped -62.39% vs UTG's -67.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.