PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PDT vs. UTG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PDT and UTG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

PDT vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
11.50%
19.19%
PDT
UTG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PDT:

1.87

UTG:

2.24

Sortino Ratio

PDT:

2.60

UTG:

2.86

Omega Ratio

PDT:

1.32

UTG:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

PDT:

0.94

UTG:

2.02

Martin Ratio

PDT:

9.08

UTG:

10.77

Ulcer Index

PDT:

2.92%

UTG:

2.98%

Daily Std Dev

PDT:

14.17%

UTG:

14.34%

Max Drawdown

PDT:

-62.39%

UTG:

-67.51%

Current Drawdown

PDT:

-5.76%

UTG:

-5.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDT achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than UTG's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PDT has underperformed UTG with an annualized return of 7.66%, while UTG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.43% annualized return.


PDT

YTD

-0.08%

1M

2.50%

6M

11.50%

1Y

28.40%

5Y*

1.02%

10Y*

7.66%

UTG

YTD

3.28%

1M

1.53%

6M

19.19%

1Y

32.75%

5Y*

4.40%

10Y*

8.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PDT vs. UTG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PDT is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PDT is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PDT is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PDT is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PDT is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PDT is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTG is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTG is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTG is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTG is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTG is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTG is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PDT vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PDT, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.872.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for PDT, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.002.602.86
The chart of Omega ratio for PDT, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.321.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for PDT, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.942.02
The chart of Martin ratio for PDT, currently valued at 9.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.009.0810.77
PDT
UTG

The current PDT Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDT and UTG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.87
2.24
PDT
UTG

Dividends

PDT vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

PDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than UTG's 6.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
7.17%7.82%10.20%9.09%6.45%8.47%6.73%8.73%9.98%9.17%7.88%7.32%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
6.97%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.54%9.42%7.29%5.53%

Drawdowns

PDT vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDT drawdown since its inception was -62.39%, smaller than the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDT and UTG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.76%
-5.35%
PDT
UTG

Volatility

PDT vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) is 4.98%, while Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that PDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.98%
5.82%
PDT
UTG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab