PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PDT vs. HDV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PDTHDV
YTD Return32.79%20.55%
1Y Return43.99%30.43%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.45%10.57%
5Y Return (Ann)3.00%8.54%
10Y Return (Ann)8.04%8.38%
Sharpe Ratio2.872.96
Sortino Ratio3.814.32
Omega Ratio1.481.54
Calmar Ratio1.253.43
Martin Ratio17.5922.47
Ulcer Index2.36%1.29%
Daily Std Dev14.42%9.79%
Max Drawdown-62.39%-37.04%
Current Drawdown-3.73%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between PDT and HDV is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PDT vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PDT achieves a 32.79% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 20.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PDT having a 8.04% annualized return and HDV not far ahead at 8.38%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.68%
10.52%
PDT
HDV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PDT vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDT has a 5.06% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
Expense ratio chart for PDT: current value at 5.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%5.06%
Expense ratio chart for HDV: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PDT vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PDT, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PDT, currently valued at 3.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PDT, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PDT, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PDT, currently valued at 17.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0017.59
HDV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HDV, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HDV, currently valued at 4.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HDV, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HDV, currently valued at 3.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HDV, currently valued at 22.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0022.47

PDT vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDT and HDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.87
2.96
PDT
HDV

Dividends

PDT vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

PDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than HDV's 3.32% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
6.92%10.20%9.09%6.45%8.47%6.73%8.73%9.98%9.17%7.88%7.32%10.78%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.32%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%3.20%3.17%

Drawdowns

PDT vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDT drawdown since its inception was -62.39%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDT and HDV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.73%
0
PDT
HDV

Volatility

PDT vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 2.60%. This indicates that PDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.38%
2.60%
PDT
HDV