PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAJL vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAJL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAJL achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.57% return.


JAJL

1D
0.17%
1M
0.27%
6M
2.81%
YTD
3.30%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.82%

QTAP

1D
0.27%
1M
0.15%
6M
12.76%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.49M$1.87M$1.42M
$235.81K$225.86K$220.48K

JAJL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAJL and QTAP is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

0.69

The correlation between JAJL and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAJL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAJL
JAJL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JAJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAJL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JAJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAJL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAJL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAJLQTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.69

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.05

6.93

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.14

33.23

-2.10

JAJL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAJL Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAJL and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAJL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAJL drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAJL and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAJLQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-29.44%

+27.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.01%

-2.81%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.05%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-4.91%

+4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.59%

-0.39%

Volatility

JAJL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) is 0.74%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that JAJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAJLQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

2.75%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

5.69%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

6.61%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.64%

18.92%

-16.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

18.57%

-15.93%

JAJL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JAJL and QTAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

JAJL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither JAJL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JAJL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTAP has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to JAJL (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAJL dropped -2.16% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.30% vs 6.27% for JAJL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JAJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.30% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JAJL and QTAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JAJL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JAJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QTAP is Leveraged Equities.

JAJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAJL and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer