JAJL vs. CPSJ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JAJL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul) and CPSJ (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. JAJL is actively managed, while CPSJ is passively managed. Over the past year, JAJL returned 6.27% vs 6.06% for CPSJ. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JAJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSJ.

Performance

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPSJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JAJL having a 3.30% return and CPSJ slightly higher at 3.32%.

JAJL

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 2.81%
• YTD: 3.30%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.82%

CPSJ

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.79%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 1Y: 6.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CPSJ Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	$364.98K	$353.08K	$242.70K
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul	$1.49M	$1.87M	$1.42M

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul	3.30%	6.56%	4.20%
CPSJ Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	3.32%	7.43%	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JAJL and CPSJ is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024	0.66

The correlation between JAJL and CPSJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JAJL vs. CPSJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAJL

JAJL Risk / Return Rank: 97
JAJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
JAJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JAJL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JAJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
JAJL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CPSJ

CPSJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
CPSJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CPSJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CPSJ Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPSJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CPSJ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPSJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JAJL	CPSJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.23	2.90	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.11	4.60	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.62	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.05	4.37	+1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	31.14	24.41	+6.73

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAJL Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the CPSJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAJL and CPSJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAJL drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum CPSJ drawdown of -5.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAJL and CPSJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAJL	CPSJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-5.36%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.01%	-1.38%	+0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.04%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.27%	-0.43%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.25%	-0.05%

Volatility

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPSJ) at 0.64%. This indicates that JAJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAJL	CPSJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	0.64%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.48%	1.71%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89%	2.09%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.64%	4.43%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.64%	4.43%	-1.79%

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAJL vs. CPSJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither JAJL nor CPSJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAJL and CPSJ in my portfolio?

JAJL and CPSJ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAJL or CPSJ?

JAJL has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to CPSJ (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAJL dropped -2.16% vs CPSJ's -5.36%.

Which ETF is better, JAJL or CPSJ?

On 1-year performance, JAJL leads with 6.27% vs 6.06% for CPSJ. On fees, CPSJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JAJL or CPSJ?

Over the 1-year period, JAJL has performed better with a 6.27% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JAJL or CPSJ?

CPSJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JAJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JAJL or CPSJ?

JAJL and CPSJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between JAJL and CPSJ?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for JAJL and 0.69% for CPSJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.