JAJL vs. EBUF

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF).

JAJL and EBUF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JAJL is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 28, 2024. EBUF is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 28, 2024.

Performance

JAJL vs. EBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JAJL vs. EBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul	0.07%	6.56%	4.48%
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	2.98%	11.55%	2.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAJL achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than EBUF's 2.98% return.

JAJL

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: 1.43%
• 1Y: 7.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBUF

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 4.90%
• 1Y: 12.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAJL vs. EBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EBUF's 0.89% expense ratio.

EBUF

Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

JAJL

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul

Return for Risk

JAJL vs. EBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAJL

JAJL Risk / Return Rank: 97
JAJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
JAJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JAJL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JAJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAJL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

EBUF

EBUF Risk / Return Rank: 81
EBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAJL vs. EBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JAJL	EBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	1.54	+1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	2.39	+1.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.43	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.93	1.81	+5.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.51	14.14	+12.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JAJL vs. EBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the EBUF Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAJL and EBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JAJL	EBUF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	1.54	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.34	1.53	+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between JAJL and EBUF is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

JAJL vs. EBUF - Dividend Comparison

Neither JAJL nor EBUF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

JAJL vs. EBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAJL drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum EBUF drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAJL and EBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAJL	EBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-6.49%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.01%	-3.28%	+2.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-0.48%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-0.53%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	0.82%	-0.56%

Volatility

JAJL vs. EBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) is 0.65%, while Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that JAJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAJL	EBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	3.05%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.40%	4.47%	-3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68%	7.57%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.74%	6.57%	-3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.74%	6.57%	-3.83%