JAJL vs. PAPR
JAJL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. JAJL is actively managed, while PAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, JAJL returned 8.02% vs 14.71% for PAPR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
JAJL vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAJL achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 7.62% return.
JAJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 8.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 11.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- —
JAJL vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul | 2.76% | 6.56% | 4.20% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.62% | 6.58% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAJL and PAPR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between JAJL and PAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAJL vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank
JAJL
PAPR
JAJL vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAJL | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 2.05 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 12.74 | -4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.83 | 66.73 | -23.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAJL vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAJL drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum PAPR drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAJL and PAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAJL | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -15.31% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.01% | -1.16% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.31% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -1.56% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 0.22% | -0.03% |
Volatility
JAJL vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) is 0.46%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that JAJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAJL | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 1.40% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.43% | 2.75% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04% | 3.42% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 8.22% | -5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 9.42% | -6.76% |
JAJL vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JAJL and PAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
JAJL vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither JAJL nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAJL and PAPR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAPR has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to JAJL (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAJL dropped -2.16% vs PAPR's -15.31%.
On 1-year performance, PAPR leads with 14.71% vs 8.02% for JAJL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JAJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PAPR has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JAJL and PAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
JAJL and PAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 3.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAJL and PAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer