PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAGLX vs. JFNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JAGLX having a -2.55% return and JFNAX slightly lower at -2.59%. Over the past 10 years, JAGLX has outperformed JFNAX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while JFNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.


JAGLX

1D
1.14%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.94%

JFNAX

1D
1.13%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
25.93%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
-2.55%24.72%8.50%7.41%-2.79%6.66%25.52%29.12%4.05%22.13%
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
-2.59%24.61%3.41%7.35%-2.86%6.59%25.42%28.98%4.00%22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JAGLX and JFNAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009

1.00

The correlation between JAGLX and JFNAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAGLX vs. JFNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAGLX
JAGLX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JAGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JAGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

JFNAX
JFNAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JFNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JFNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAGLXJFNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.72

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

8.60

+0.06

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the JFNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAGLX and JFNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAGLXJFNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.77

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.44

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.83

-0.25

Drawdowns

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAGLX drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than JFNAX's maximum drawdown of -31.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAGLX and JFNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAGLXJFNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-31.07%

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-9.71%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

-21.28%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-22.29%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.38%

-27.39%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

-5.51%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.43%

-6.29%

-11.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.06%

-0.01%

Volatility

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A (JFNAX) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAGLXJFNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

4.81%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

10.90%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

14.87%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

15.86%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

17.38%

+0.03%

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAGLX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than JFNAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAGLX vs. JFNAX - Dividend Comparison

JAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, which matches JFNAX's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
4.65%4.53%10.98%4.22%0.14%9.78%7.75%6.17%13.38%0.89%1.13%9.09%
JFNAX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class A
4.68%4.56%5.74%4.28%0.08%9.90%7.82%6.18%13.55%1.03%0.97%8.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, JAGLX and JFNAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JFNAX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to JAGLX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAGLX dropped -58.96% vs JFNAX's -31.07%.

JAGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAGLX and JFNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer