PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IYW vs. XLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IYW vs. XLF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYW returned 25.53%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for XLF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYW charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.

Performance

IYW vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYW achieves a 22.81% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, IYW has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 25.53%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.79% annualized return.

IYW

1D
1.61%
1M
2.72%
YTD
22.81%
6M
20.20%
1Y
50.11%
3Y*
33.35%
5Y*
21.56%
10Y*
25.53%

XLF

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYW vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF		22.81%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%35.44%47.45%46.64%-0.93%36.60%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF		-4.62%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IYW and XLF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between IYW and XLF has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with IYW:
IYW vs. VGTIYW vs. QQQIYW vs. XLKIYW vs. IGMIYW vs. SMHIYW vs. IWFIYW vs. SOXX
Often compared with XLF:
XLF vs. SPYXLF vs. VFHXLF vs. KBWBXLF vs. XLVXLF vs. KREXLF vs. KBEXLF vs. JPM

Return for Risk

IYW vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYW vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IYWXLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.40
0.20

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.97
0.37

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.05

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

0.20

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

0.51

+8.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IYW vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYW Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYW and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IYWXLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.20

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.46

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.58

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.21

+0.14

Drawdowns

IYW vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYW drawdown since its inception was -81.90%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYW and XLF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IYWXLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.90%

-82.69%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.81%

-14.79%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.47%

-15.54%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.44%

-25.81%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

-42.86%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-7.38%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-20.02%

-14.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

5.71%

-0.25%

Volatility

IYW vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.20%. This indicates that IYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IYWXLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

4.20%

+4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.10%

11.18%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.05%

14.61%

+6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

18.66%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.18%

22.18%

+3.00%

IYW vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYW vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

IYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XLF's 1.52% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF		0.11%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF		1.52%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

IYW and XLF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYW has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to XLF (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYW dropped -81.90% vs XLF's -82.69%.

On 10-year performance, IYW leads with 25.53% vs 12.79% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYW has performed better with a 25.53% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYW.

XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.11% for IYW.

IYW is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYW and 0.08% for XLF.

IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYW and XLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer