PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYRI vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYRI vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 3.08% return.


IYRI

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.51%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PFFA

1D
0.19%
1M
0.57%
YTD
3.08%
6M
2.32%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYRI vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IYRI and PFFA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYRI vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYRI
IYRI Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IYRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IYRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYRI Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYRI vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYRIPFFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.33

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.95

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

6.47

-2.69

IYRI vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYRI and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYRI vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRIPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-70.52%

+58.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-6.49%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-1.50%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-6.62%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.95%

+0.15%

Volatility

IYRI vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 2.17%. This indicates that IYRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRIPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

2.17%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

5.89%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

7.13%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

11.53%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

31.76%

-18.58%

IYRI vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYRI vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.23%, more than PFFA's 9.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
12.23%11.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
8.82%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYRI and PFFA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYRI has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to PFFA (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

On 1-year performance, PFFA leads with 12.37% vs 8.01% for IYRI. On fees, IYRI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, PFFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 12.37% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYRI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

IYRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.23%, compared with 8.82% for PFFA.

IYRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while PFFA is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYRI and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer