PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYJ vs. XLII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYJ vs. XLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly lower than XLII's 13.54% return.


IYJ

1D
1.71%
1M
0.11%
6M
7.11%
YTD
12.88%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
12.57%
ALL TIME*
8.09%

XLII

1D
1.46%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.62%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.95M$14.74M$15.31M
$466.82K$338.40K$220.17K

IYJ vs. XLII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IYJ and XLII is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.93

The correlation between IYJ and XLII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYJ vs. XLII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYJ
XLII

Industrials

65.6%
93.8%

Financial Services

17.3%
100.8%

Technology

7.1%
5.9%

Basic Materials

4.5%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
0.3%

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

IYJ
65.6%
XLII
93.8%

Financial Services

IYJ
17.3%
XLII
100.8%

Technology

IYJ
7.1%
XLII
5.9%

Basic Materials

IYJ
4.5%
XLII

-

Utilities

IYJ
3.3%
XLII

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYJ
1.6%
XLII
0.3%

Healthcare

IYJ
0.4%
XLII

-

Consumer Defensive

IYJ
0.0%
XLII

-

Communication Services

IYJ

-

XLII

-

Energy

IYJ

-

XLII

-

Real Estate

IYJ

-

XLII

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYJ vs. XLII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYJ
IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XLII
XLII Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLII Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLII Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XLII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLII Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYJ vs. XLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYJXLIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.23

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

10.06

-4.27

IYJ vs. XLII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the XLII Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYJ and XLII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYJ vs. XLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than XLII's maximum drawdown of -10.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and XLII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYJXLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.97%

-10.10%

-51.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-10.10%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-1.27%

-9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.24%

+0.86%

Volatility

IYJ vs. XLII - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) at 4.09%. This indicates that IYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYJXLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.09%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

10.53%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

12.30%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

12.29%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

12.29%

+7.61%

IYJ vs. XLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XLII's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYJ vs. XLII - Dividend Comparison

IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than XLII's 13.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
0.70%0.83%0.88%1.05%1.05%0.76%1.01%1.32%1.43%1.29%1.38%1.53%
XLII
State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
13.20%5.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IYJ and XLII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IYJ has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to XLII (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs XLII's -10.10%.

On 1-year performance, XLII leads with 22.47% vs 17.95% for IYJ. On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLII has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLII has performed better with a 22.47% return vs 17.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYJ.

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 13.20%, compared with 0.70% for IYJ.

IYJ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.35% for XLII.

XLII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYJ and XLII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer