IYJ vs. EFIV
IYJ (iShares U.S. Industrials ETF) and EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYJ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while EFIV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IYJ returned 8.13%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for EFIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IYJ charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EFIV.
Performance
IYJ vs. EFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than EFIV's 10.67% return.
IYJ
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
EFIV
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
IYJ vs. EFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF | 6.47% | 11.94% | 17.82% | 19.94% | -13.53% | 17.02% | 24.46% |
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 10.67% | 18.47% | 23.80% | 27.92% | -17.76% | 31.70% | 16.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYJ and EFIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IYJ and EFIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYJ vs. EFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYJ
EFIV
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IYJ
EFIV
Financial Services
IYJ
EFIV
Technology
IYJ
EFIV
Basic Materials
IYJ
EFIV
Utilities
IYJ
EFIV
Consumer Cyclical
IYJ
EFIV
Healthcare
IYJ
EFIV
Communication Services
IYJ
-
EFIV
Consumer Defensive
IYJ
-
EFIV
Energy
IYJ
-
EFIV
Real Estate
IYJ
-
EFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYJ vs. EFIV — Risk / Return Rank
IYJ
EFIV
IYJ vs. EFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYJ | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 2.75 | -1.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 3.81 | -2.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.50 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 3.46 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 16.08 | -11.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYJ | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.75 | -1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.88 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.07 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
IYJ vs. EFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than EFIV's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and EFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYJ | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.97% | -24.52% | -37.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -9.44% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -19.23% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.24% | -24.52% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -0.34% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -4.81% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.03% | +1.11% |
Volatility
IYJ vs. EFIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) at 3.06%. This indicates that IYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYJ | EFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 3.06% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 8.97% | +2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 11.77% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 16.92% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 16.83% | +3.04% |
IYJ vs. EFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EFIV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYJ vs. EFIV - Dividend Comparison
IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than EFIV's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.19% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF | 0.78% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.76% | 1.01% | 1.32% | 1.43% | 1.29% | 1.38% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYJ and EFIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYJ has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to EFIV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs EFIV's -24.52%.
On 5-year performance, EFIV leads with 14.83% vs 8.13% for IYJ. On fees, EFIV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFIV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYJ.
EFIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.78% for IYJ.
IYJ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while EFIV is S&P 500. IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.10% for EFIV.
EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYJ and EFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer