IYJ vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IYJ (iShares U.S. Industrials ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from iShares - IYJ tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index while IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYJ returned 12.31%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for IGF. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYJ charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

IYJ vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 8.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IYJ has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 12.31%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.

IYJ

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

IGF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYJ vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF	5.81%	11.94%	17.82%	19.94%	-13.53%	17.02%	17.37%	32.27%	-11.69%	23.98%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	8.05%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IYJ and IGF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007	0.71

The correlation between IYJ and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYJ vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IYJ	IGF
Industrials	66.6%	38.8%
Financial Services	17.0%	-
Technology	6.6%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	-
Utilities	3.6%	41.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	-
Healthcare	0.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	20.1%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

IYJ vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYJ

IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 25
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 44
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYJ vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IYJ	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.47	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	2.10	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.26	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	2.62	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	8.05	-3.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IYJ vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYJ and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IYJ	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.47	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.73	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.49	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.24	+0.13

Drawdowns

IYJ vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IYJ	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.97%	-58.33%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.39%	-5.87%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.67%	-14.28%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.24%	-20.83%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.20%	-42.11%	+1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-4.43%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.21%	-11.87%	+0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	1.90%	+1.24%

Volatility

IYJ vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.68%. This indicates that IYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IYJ	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	3.68%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	8.59%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	10.49%	+4.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.04%	13.99%	+4.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.87%	16.83%	+3.04%

IYJ vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYJ vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than IGF's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.98%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF	0.78%	0.83%	0.88%	1.05%	1.05%	0.76%	1.01%	1.32%	1.43%	1.29%	1.38%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IYJ and IGF in my portfolio?

IYJ and IGF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IYJ or IGF?

IYJ has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to IGF (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, IYJ or IGF?

On 10-year performance, IYJ leads with 12.31% vs 8.29% for IGF. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IYJ or IGF?

Over the 10-year period, IYJ has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IYJ or IGF?

IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IYJ or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.78% for IYJ.

What is the main difference between IYJ and IGF?

IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.