PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYG vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 30.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IYG has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 13.56%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.


IYG

1D
2.82%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
13.56%

VGT

1D
-0.88%
1M
14.99%
YTD
30.49%
6M
28.76%
1Y
58.31%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-3.88%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
30.49%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IYG and VGT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between IYG and VGT has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYG
VGT

Financial Services

100.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IYG
100.0%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

IYG

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

IYG

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IYG

-

VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

IYG

-

VGT

-

Energy

IYG

-

VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

IYG

-

VGT
0.0%

Industrials

IYG

-

VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

IYG

-

VGT

-

Technology

IYG

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

IYG

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYGVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.46

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

3.57

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

11.41

-9.90

IYG vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYG and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYGVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.85

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.88

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

1.04

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.68

-0.45

Drawdowns

IYG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYGVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-54.63%

-27.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-16.40%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-27.23%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-35.07%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-35.07%

-9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-2.35%

-4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

-7.95%

-12.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

5.13%

+0.98%

Volatility

IYG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) is 4.41%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that IYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYGVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

6.51%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

16.09%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

20.55%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

25.17%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

24.60%

-1.06%

IYG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.11%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYG and VGT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to IYG (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYG dropped -81.84% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.62% vs 13.56% for IYG. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

IYG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

IYG is categorized as Financials Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYG and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYG and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer