PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYG vs. GSIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IYG vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IYG vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-9.91%19.85%31.94%1.34%
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
-3.15%61.67%32.86%2.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's -3.15% return.


IYG

1D
2.50%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
-9.91%
6M
-7.02%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
13.55%

GSIB

1D
4.01%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
7.71%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IYG vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IYG vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIB
GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYG vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYGGSIBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

1.79

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.56

2.39

-1.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

2.51

-2.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.50

8.62

-7.12

IYG vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYG and GSIB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYGGSIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

1.79

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

2.15

-1.93

Correlation

The correlation between IYG and GSIB is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IYG vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than GSIB's 1.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.18%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
1.97%1.91%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IYG vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and GSIB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IYGGSIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-17.71%

-64.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-14.59%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.05%

-9.87%

-3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-2.06%

-18.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

4.25%

+1.00%

Volatility

IYG vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) is 5.13%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that IYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IYGGSIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

7.69%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

13.05%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.91%

20.79%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

18.39%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.62%

18.39%

+5.23%