PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYG vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYG vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYG achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYG having a 13.56% annualized return and DGRW not far ahead at 14.19%.


IYG

1D
2.82%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
13.56%

DGRW

1D
0.71%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYG vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-3.88%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.87%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IYG and DGRW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.77

The correlation between IYG and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYG vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYG
DGRW

Financial Services

100.0%
11.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.3%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.7%

Energy

-

5.0%

Healthcare

-

12.8%

Industrials

-

9.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

32.1%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Financial Services

IYG
100.0%
DGRW
11.3%

Basic Materials

IYG

-

DGRW
3.3%

Communication Services

IYG

-

DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IYG

-

DGRW
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IYG

-

DGRW
6.7%

Energy

IYG

-

DGRW
5.0%

Healthcare

IYG

-

DGRW
12.8%

Industrials

IYG

-

DGRW
9.9%

Real Estate

IYG

-

DGRW

-

Technology

IYG

-

DGRW
32.1%

Utilities

IYG

-

DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYG vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYG vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYGDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.64

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

11.58

-10.07

IYG vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYG and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYGDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.22

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.89

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.88

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.86

-0.64

Drawdowns

IYG vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYG drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYG and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYGDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-32.04%

-49.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.90%

-8.30%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-16.21%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-17.27%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-32.04%

-12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-0.12%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

-3.01%

-17.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

1.89%

+4.22%

Volatility

IYG vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.49%. This indicates that IYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYGDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

2.49%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

7.67%

+4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

9.89%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

13.97%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

16.21%

+7.33%

IYG vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYG vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

IYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.11%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYG and DGRW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYG has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to DGRW (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYG dropped -81.84% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.19% vs 13.56% for IYG. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.19% return vs 13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 1.11% for IYG.

IYG is categorized as Financials Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYG and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYG and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer