IYF vs. IYC
IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while IYC is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYF returned 13.53%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for IYC. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYF charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
IYF vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly higher than IYC's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IYF has outperformed IYC with an annualized return of 13.53%, while IYC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.
IYF
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 13.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
IYC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
IYF vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | -0.19% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.40% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYF and IYC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2000 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IYF and IYC shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYF vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYF
IYC
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IYF
IYC
-
Real Estate
IYF
IYC
-
Technology
IYF
IYC
Basic Materials
IYF
-
IYC
-
Communication Services
IYF
-
IYC
Consumer Cyclical
IYF
-
IYC
Consumer Defensive
IYF
-
IYC
Energy
IYF
-
IYC
Healthcare
IYF
-
IYC
-
Industrials
IYF
-
IYC
Utilities
IYF
-
IYC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYF vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
IYF
IYC
IYF vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYF | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.07 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.44 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | 1.28 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYF vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYF | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -53.10% | -25.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -11.97% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -21.62% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -35.90% | +10.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.57% | -35.90% | -6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.25% | -5.12% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.59% | -9.95% | -7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 4.08% | +1.05% |
Volatility
IYF vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYF | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 4.33% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 10.74% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 14.44% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 20.74% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 19.90% | +1.00% |
IYF vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYF has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYF vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than IYC's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.49% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYF and IYC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYC has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to IYF (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs IYC's -53.10%.
On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.53% vs 11.83% for IYC. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.
IYF has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.50% for IYC.
IYF is categorized as Financials Equities, while IYC is Consumer Discretionary Equities. IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYF and 0.38% for IYC.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYF and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer