IYF vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
IYF and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IYF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. It was launched on May 31, 2000. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both IYF and XLF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IYF or XLF.
Performance
IYF vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a 35.81% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 33.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYF having a 11.96% annualized return and XLF not far behind at 11.83%.
IYF
35.81%
5.64%
20.59%
47.70%
13.36%
11.96%
XLF
33.26%
4.87%
19.02%
43.33%
12.87%
11.83%
Key characteristics
| IYF | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.18 | 3.14 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.46 | 4.45 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.58 | 1.57 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.42 | 3.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 22.73 | 22.40 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.09% | 1.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.97% | 13.77% |
| Max Drawdown | -79.09% | -82.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.82% | -0.96% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IYF vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYF has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between IYF and XLF is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IYF vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IYF vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than XLF's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.20% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.33% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.34% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
IYF vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IYF vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 7.02%. This indicates that IYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.