PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYF vs. KBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYF vs. KBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than KBE's 16.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IYF has outperformed KBE with an annualized return of 13.70%, while KBE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.05% annualized return.


IYF

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.09%
6M
6.28%
YTD
5.27%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
13.70%
ALL TIME*
6.14%

KBE

1D
0.24%
1M
1.50%
6M
10.80%
YTD
16.05%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
11.05%
ALL TIME*
3.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$64.39M$58.62M$40.71M
$98.17M$107.02M$128.95M

IYF vs. KBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
5.27%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%
KBE
State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF
16.05%12.36%23.78%5.30%-14.83%33.46%-8.75%29.78%-19.65%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IYF and KBE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.89

The correlation between IYF and KBE shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYF vs. KBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYF
KBE

Financial Services

99.0%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IYF
99.0%
KBE
100.0%

Real Estate

IYF
0.7%
KBE

-

Technology

IYF
0.3%
KBE

-

Basic Materials

IYF

-

KBE

-

Communication Services

IYF

-

KBE

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYF

-

KBE

-

Consumer Defensive

IYF

-

KBE

-

Energy

IYF

-

KBE

-

Healthcare

IYF

-

KBE

-

Industrials

IYF

-

KBE

-

Utilities

IYF

-

KBE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYF vs. KBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

KBE
KBE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
KBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYF vs. KBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYFKBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.24

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.85

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

4.90

-2.57

IYF vs. KBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYF Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the KBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYF and KBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYF vs. KBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, roughly equal to the maximum KBE drawdown of -83.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and KBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYFKBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.09%

-83.15%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-14.63%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-25.97%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-45.25%

+20.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.57%

-53.14%

+10.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-2.30%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.51%

-27.33%

+9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

5.50%

-0.36%

Volatility

IYF vs. KBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) is 3.97%, while State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that IYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYFKBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

5.24%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

14.49%

-3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

21.29%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

27.05%

-8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

29.67%

-8.85%

IYF vs. KBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than KBE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYF vs. KBE - Dividend Comparison

IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than KBE's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
1.42%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%
KBE
State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.11%2.51%2.35%2.78%2.99%2.16%2.44%2.33%2.18%1.36%1.39%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYF and KBE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBE has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to IYF (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs KBE's -83.15%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.70% vs 11.05% for KBE. On fees, KBE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYF.

KBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.42% for IYF.

IYF tracks Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index, while KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYF and 0.35% for KBE.

KBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYF and KBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer