PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. XRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. XRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has outperformed XRT with an annualized return of 11.41%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.06% annualized return.


IYC

1D
1.51%
1M
-0.91%
6M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.67%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
11.41%
ALL TIME*
8.42%

XRT

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.95%
6M
4.50%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
9.06%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.52M$10.35M$12.04M
$422.92M$379.59M$454.03M

IYC vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.67%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
5.78%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and XRT is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.82

The correlation between IYC and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYC vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
XRT

Consumer Cyclical

66.8%
75.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
18.7%

Communication Services

10.6%
1.8%

Technology

7.0%
2.7%

Industrials

3.9%

-

Energy

0.1%
1.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
66.8%
XRT
75.2%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.5%
XRT
18.7%

Communication Services

IYC
10.6%
XRT
1.8%

Technology

IYC
7.0%
XRT
2.7%

Industrials

IYC
3.9%
XRT

-

Energy

IYC
0.1%
XRT
1.3%

Basic Materials

IYC

-

XRT

-

Financial Services

IYC

-

XRT

-

Healthcare

IYC

-

XRT
1.6%

Real Estate

IYC

-

XRT

-

Utilities

IYC

-

XRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYC vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCXRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.14

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.14

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

2.57

-2.21

IYC vs. XRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the XRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and XRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and XRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCXRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-65.81%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-13.53%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-25.62%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-44.57%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-47.02%

+11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-7.00%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-14.95%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

5.97%

-1.33%

Volatility

IYC vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 5.21%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCXRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

6.04%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

14.92%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

20.84%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

26.89%

-6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

27.20%

-7.25%

IYC vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than XRT's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.75%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYC and XRT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRT has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to IYC (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs XRT's -65.81%.

On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.41% vs 9.06% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.35% for XRT.

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and XRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer