PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. XLYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. XLYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than XLYI's -0.31% return.


IYC

1D
1.51%
1M
-0.91%
6M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.67%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
11.41%
ALL TIME*
8.42%

XLYI

1D
2.83%
1M
-0.39%
6M
-2.34%
YTD
-0.31%
1Y
8.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.52M$10.35M$12.04M
$81.44K$62.05K$59.61K

IYC vs. XLYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IYC and XLYI is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.92

The correlation between IYC and XLYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYC vs. XLYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
XLYI

Consumer Cyclical

66.8%
99.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%

-

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Technology

7.0%
1.0%

Industrials

3.9%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
66.8%
XLYI
99.0%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.5%
XLYI

-

Communication Services

IYC
10.6%
XLYI

-

Technology

IYC
7.0%
XLYI
1.0%

Industrials

IYC
3.9%
XLYI

-

Energy

IYC
0.1%
XLYI

-

Basic Materials

IYC

-

XLYI

-

Financial Services

IYC

-

XLYI
99.8%

Healthcare

IYC

-

XLYI

-

Real Estate

IYC

-

XLYI

-

Utilities

IYC

-

XLYI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. XLYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XLYI
XLYI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLYI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLYI Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYC vs. XLYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCXLYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.08

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.53

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

1.50

-1.14

IYC vs. XLYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the XLYI Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and XLYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. XLYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, which is greater than XLYI's maximum drawdown of -12.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and XLYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCXLYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-12.32%

-40.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-12.32%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-3.86%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-3.29%

-6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

4.33%

+0.31%

Volatility

IYC vs. XLYI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 5.21%, while State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCXLYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

6.42%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

12.97%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

16.34%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

16.32%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

16.32%

+3.63%

IYC vs. XLYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. XLYI - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than XLYI's 14.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
XLYI
State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
14.79%6.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IYC and XLYI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLYI has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to IYC (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs XLYI's -12.32%.

On 1-year performance, XLYI leads with 8.70% vs 3.59% for IYC. On fees, XLYI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLYI has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLYI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

XLYI has the higher dividend yield at 14.79%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.35% for XLYI.

XLYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and XLYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer