IYC vs. RXI
IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) and RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from iShares - IYC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index while RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYC returned 11.80%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for RXI. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IYC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for RXI.
Performance
IYC vs. RXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly higher than RXI's -6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has outperformed RXI with an annualized return of 11.80%, while RXI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.97% annualized return.
IYC
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -4.50%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
RXI
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
IYC vs. RXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.42% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 24.58% | 27.36% | 1.76% | 19.87% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -6.75% | 13.16% | 17.26% | 27.57% | -29.08% | 16.32% | 24.46% | 26.78% | -6.30% | 22.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYC and RXI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2006 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IYC and RXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYC vs. RXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYC
RXI
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYC
RXI
Communication Services
IYC
RXI
Consumer Defensive
IYC
RXI
Technology
IYC
RXI
Industrials
IYC
RXI
Energy
IYC
RXI
-
Basic Materials
IYC
-
RXI
-
Financial Services
IYC
-
RXI
-
Healthcare
IYC
-
RXI
-
Real Estate
IYC
-
RXI
-
Utilities
IYC
-
RXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYC vs. RXI — Risk / Return Rank
IYC
RXI
IYC vs. RXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYC | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.28 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 0.81 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYC vs. RXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum RXI drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and RXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYC | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.10% | -60.36% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -15.17% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.62% | -19.64% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.90% | -35.78% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.90% | -35.78% | -0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -10.37% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -10.53% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 5.34% | -1.17% |
Volatility
IYC vs. RXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.93%, while iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYC | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.67% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 13.08% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 16.71% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 21.02% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 20.09% | -0.18% |
IYC vs. RXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RXI's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYC vs. RXI - Dividend Comparison
IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than RXI's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.49% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IYC and RXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RXI has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to IYC (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs RXI's -60.36%.
On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.80% vs 9.97% for RXI. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.
RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.52% for IYC.
IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.46% for RXI.
RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYC and RXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer