PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. RXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. RXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly higher than RXI's -1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has outperformed RXI with an annualized return of 11.41%, while RXI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.


IYC

1D
1.51%
1M
-0.91%
6M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.67%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
11.41%
ALL TIME*
8.42%

RXI

1D
2.25%
1M
2.64%
6M
-2.71%
YTD
-1.88%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
9.87%
ALL TIME*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.52M$10.35M$12.04M
$5.27M$3.01M$2.20M

IYC vs. RXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.67%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
RXI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.88%13.16%17.26%27.57%-29.08%16.32%24.46%26.78%-6.30%22.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and RXI is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2006

0.87

The correlation between IYC and RXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYC vs. RXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
RXI

Consumer Cyclical

66.8%
94.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
0.8%

Communication Services

10.6%
0.2%

Technology

7.0%
4.1%

Industrials

3.9%
0.1%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
66.8%
RXI
94.9%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.5%
RXI
0.8%

Communication Services

IYC
10.6%
RXI
0.2%

Technology

IYC
7.0%
RXI
4.1%

Industrials

IYC
3.9%
RXI
0.1%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
RXI

-

Basic Materials

IYC

-

RXI

-

Financial Services

IYC

-

RXI

-

Healthcare

IYC

-

RXI

-

Real Estate

IYC

-

RXI

-

Utilities

IYC

-

RXI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. RXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

RXI
RXI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYC vs. RXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCRXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.09

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.53

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

1.33

-0.97

IYC vs. RXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the RXI Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and RXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. RXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum RXI drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and RXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCRXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-60.36%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-15.17%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-19.64%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-35.78%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-35.78%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-5.69%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-10.52%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

5.99%

-1.35%

Volatility

IYC vs. RXI - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCRXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

5.36%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

13.61%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

17.04%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

21.06%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

20.10%

-0.15%

IYC vs. RXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RXI's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. RXI - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than RXI's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
RXI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.42%1.55%1.07%1.00%1.00%0.89%0.65%1.48%1.73%1.26%1.77%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IYC and RXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RXI has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to IYC (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs RXI's -60.36%.

On 10-year performance, IYC leads with 11.41% vs 9.87% for RXI. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYC has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.

RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.46% for RXI.

RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and RXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer